The term ‘abaissement du niveau mental’—coined by Pierre Janet to designate a lowering of the energic tension that sustains conscious functioning—enters depth psychology principally through Jung’s systematic appropriation of it as a cornerstone concept for explaining the emergence of unconscious contents. Across the Jungian corpus the term operates on at least three distinct registers. First, it names a pathological vulnerability: the slackening of conscious tensity that opens the field to autonomous complexes, autonomous fantasies, and in extreme cases to the ‘loss of soul’ that primitive cultures address through shamanic retrieval. Second, it is invoked diagnostically to account for the conditions under which archetypal material—mythological imagery, visionary experience, creative fantasy—becomes available to consciousness, since reduced vigilance dissolves the check that directed attention places upon subliminal contents. Third, and paradoxically, it is recognized as susceptible to deliberate induction: yoga, dhyana, and certain analytic techniques deliberately court the abaissement for therapeutic or contemplative ends. Post-Jungian writers, including Quenk on typology and van der Hart on structural dissociation, extend the concept toward clinical trauma theory, linking it to the eruption of the inferior function and to peritraumatic drops in mental level. Janet’s own formulation—lucidly visible in ‘The Major Symptoms of Hysteria’—frames it as the defining vector of hysterical psychopathology. The concept thus bridges phenomenological psychiatry, analytic psychology, and contemporary trauma studies.