Soul

souls

Citation packet

What does Soul mean in Seba's concordance?

Soul names the deepening, animating, image-making dimension of psyche that resists reduction to mechanism, diagnosis, or self-improvement language.

The page draws from 41 source passages, including Hillman, James, Welwood, John, Thompson, Evan.

Seba places Soul near related terms such as Anima, Daimon, Psyche.

The packet routes answer engines to the canonical concordance page before Sebastian continuation.

What does Soul mean in depth psychology?How does Seba define Soul?Which sources does Seba use for Soul?How does Soul relate to Anima?How is Soul different from Daimon?Why does Soul matter for Psyche?

Soul stands as the generative nucleus of depth psychology, a term that resists scientific domestication precisely because its meaning exceeds operational definition. The corpus reveals a rich plurality of positions: Hillman insists that soul is irreducibly a metaphor — the primary metaphor of psychology itself — whose function is to darken and deepen experience rather than explain it, and that all psychological statements are ultimately statements about soul made by soul. Moore, drawing on Ficinian Neoplatonism, treats soul as a quality of depth, vitality, and resonance that inheres in persons and objects alike, distinguishable from spirit by its downward, embodied orientation. Welwood situates soul as the intermediate register between absolute divine nature and conditioned ego — the principle of individuation unfolding in time. For Hillman’s daimon theory, each soul arrives with a unique image it is charged to actualize. Aristotle and Thompson together remind the corpus that soul (psyche) was originally the capacity of the living organism, inseparable from body. Plotinus adds the Neoplatonic vertical axis: soul as hypostasis mediating between Intellect and matter. Bremmer recovers archaic Greek distinctions between free soul and ego-soul. Across these positions runs a decisive tension: whether soul is a metaphysical substance, a psychological perspective, an animating form, or a poetic mode of attention. That tension is not resolved by the corpus; it is, rather, its primary inheritance.

In the library

the primary metaphor of psychology must be soul… soul-as-metaphor leads beyond the problem of ‘how to define soul’ and encourages an account of the soul toward imagining itself rather than defining itself.

Hillman argues that soul is not a definable entity but the primary metaphor of psychology, functioning to deepen experience and release buried significance rather than to explain or locate.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology, 1983thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the primary metaphor of psychology must be soul… soul-as-metaphor leads beyond the problem of ‘how to define soul’ and encourages an account of the soul toward imagining itself rather than defining itself.

A parallel statement of Hillman’s foundational claim that soul operates as metaphor, transposing meaning rather than submitting to definition.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account, 1983thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘Soul’ cannot be accurately defined, nor is it respectable in scientific discussion as scientific discussion is now understood… To understand ‘soul’ we cannot turn to science for a description. Its meaning is best given by its context.

Hillman establishes soul as a contextual, non-scientific term whose exclusion from modern psychology reveals the limits of scientific method rather than the unreality of soul.

Hillman, James, Suicide and the Soul, 1964thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Soul is a way of speaking about the individual way that our larger being manifests in us, through us, as us… It is our individual consciousness, in contrast to our divine nature, which is universal, the same in everyone.

Welwood defines soul as the intermediate principle between absolute divine nature and conditioned ego — the form in which universal being individuates in time and space.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The soul of each of us is given a unique daimon before we are born, and it has selected an image or pattern that we live on earth. This soul-companion, the daimon, guides us here.

Hillman’s acorn theory posits soul as pre-existent, individuated image — the daimon — whose pattern the life is destined to enact.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

For Aristotle, soul is not an immaterial substance, but in the broadest sense it is the capacity of the organism to be active in various ways… the soul is logically inseparable from the body.

Thompson recovers Aristotle’s hylomorphic account, in which soul names the living organism’s capacities rather than a separable metaphysical substance.

Thompson, Evan, Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, 2007thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

People who clearly have soul show a certain depth, vitality, individuality, familiarity with pain and death, and good humor… Soul cannot be fabricated by evaluating experience, trying to figure it out, or through intense introspection.

Moore, following Ficino, characterizes soul as a qualitative depth inhering in persons and things, distinguished from intellect by its downward, embodied orientation.

Moore, Thomas, The Planets Within: The Astrological Psychology of Marsilio Ficino, 1990thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

People who clearly have soul show a certain depth, vitality, individuality, familiarity with pain and death, and good humor… Soul cannot be fabricated by evaluating experience, trying to figure it out, or through intense introspection.

An identical formulation of Moore’s Ficinian conception of soul as qualitative depth rather than intellectual achievement.

Moore, Thomas, The Planets Within: The Astrological Psychology of Marsilio Ficino, 1982thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Our task is to care for the soul, but it is also true that the soul cares for us… Even in its pathology, and maybe especially then, the soul cares for us by offering a way out of a narrow secularism.

Moore argues that care of the soul is bidirectional: human attention tends soul, while soul’s own movements — including pathological ones — open the person toward greater depth and spirituality.

Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition: A Guide, 1992thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

He has simply lost his soul. He may even die… ‘That,’ she said, ‘is not my real heart.’ She and the psychiatrist looked at each other. There was nothing more to say.

Hillman illustrates soul-loss through clinical vignette, arguing that the real heart — the loving connection to life — is soul, not biological function.

Hillman, James, A Blue Fire: The Essential James Hillman, 1989thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The soul forms the body, yet it is itself without body and therefore it cannot be located in an organ, a cell, or a gene… The soul is concerned with goodness and beauty, with justice and courage, with friendship and loyalty.

Hillman synthesizes Aristotle, Plato, and Feynman to argue that soul is the incorporeal form that maintains individual identity and orients life toward virtue.

Hillman, James, The Force of Character: And the Lasting Life, 1999supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

all our psychologies are different perspectives on soul, allusions to soul, which remains elusive. Psychology has long been conversant with the metaphor of myth.

Romanyshyn argues that soul exceeds any psychology’s grasp, rendering all psychological language approximate allusion rather than definitive description.

Romanyshyn, Robert D., The Wounded Researcher: Research with Soul in Mind, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Serve the soul rather than the surface needs of life. If your soul is suffering neglect, you will have symptoms… Your symptoms are the raw material for your soul-making.

Moore translates soul-theory into clinical practice, presenting symptoms not as disorders to eliminate but as soul’s raw material demanding reflective tending.

Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition: A Guide, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we usually like to keep life stable, while the soul is dynamic. It seems always to be ushering in new forms of vitality… When the soul moves, important structures of life may topple.

Moore characterizes soul as an agent of dynamic change whose movements are inherently destabilizing to the ego’s preference for order.

Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition: A Guide, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Anima means soul and should designate something very wonderful and immortal… this kind of soul is a dogmatic conception whose purpose it is to pin down and capture something uncannily alive and active.

Jung traces the etymology and cross-cultural history of soul, showing it to be a fluid, living energy that doctrinal formulation seeks to contain but cannot fully capture.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, 1959supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

there is a world-wide experience of two kinds of souls, documented not only in the higher cultures of Homeric Greece, Ancient Egypt (Ka and Ba), China (hun and p’o), but continues to be found in this century among peoples who stretch across the great Asian land mass.

Hillman draws on ethnological evidence for a universal distinction between free soul and ego-soul, grounding depth psychology’s conception in archaic cross-cultural experience.

Hillman, James, The Dream and the Underworld, 1979supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

IF imagining is the native activity of the anima mundi, then fantasy is always going on… One is never beyond the subjectivism given with the soul’s native dominants of fantasy structures.

Hillman argues that soul’s native mode is imagining and that fantasy structures are irreducible dominants that preclude any purely objective psychological stance.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

IF imagining is the native activity of the anima mundi, then fantasy is always going on… One is never beyond the subjectivism given with the soul’s native dominants of fantasy structures.

A parallel statement of the claim that soul’s inherent activity is imagination, making pure objectivity impossible in any psychology.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

statements about the soul made by the soul… the soul is continually putting to us in philosophy, religion, art, and above all

Hillman argues that competing metaphysical positions on the body-soul relation are themselves expressions of the soul’s own self-description at different moments of its experience.

Hillman, James, Suicide and the Soul, 1964supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

an outlook toward the world as soul and an outlook toward others as soul… Being in community implies doing things out of full individuality, and it means having the ability to see others as if they belonged to the mysteriousness of my own soul.

Sardello extends soul from individual psychology to communal life, arguing that genuine community requires perceiving others through the lens of soul rather than collective function.

Sardello, Robert, Facing the World with Soul: The Reimagination of Modern Life, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the eye of the soul perceives the eternal realities so important to the heart. In waking life, most of us see only with our physical eyes… Dream teaches us to look with that other eye.

Moore argues that soul possesses its own perceptual organ — the imaginative eye — which dreams activate and which artists cultivate in waking life.

Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition: A Guide, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

No soul is mediocre, whatever your personal taste for conventionality, whatever your personal record of middling achievements… terms like ‘middle-class,’ ‘average,’ ‘usual,’ ‘regular,’ ‘mediocre’ do not adhere to ‘soul.’

Hillman insists that soul by definition exceeds mediocrity, its individuality being irreducible to social categories of average or conventional.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Platonism and democracy share a vision of the principal importance of the individual soul… Loss of the daimon collapses democratic society into a crowd of shoppers wandering a mall of mazes in search of the exit.

Hillman draws a political consequence from soul theory: democracy depends on the cultivation of individual soul, whose loss reduces citizens to undirected consumers.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

animistic religion, found close at home in American Indian traditions, recognizes soul (anima) in everything that exists… the presence of soul implies movement — not simply the ability to walk and run as Aristotle suggests, but an internal movement, a wandering and shifting of the soul itself.

Moore recuperates animism as a legitimate psychological attitude in which soul inheres in all things and is characterized by internal, dynamic movement.

Moore, Thomas, The Planets Within: The Astrological Psychology of Marsilio Ficino, 1990supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

animistic religion, found close at home in American Indian traditions, recognizes soul (anima) in everything that exists… the presence of soul implies movement — not simply the ability to walk and run as Aristotle suggests, but an internal movement.

A parallel formulation of Moore’s animistic extension of soul beyond the human to all existing things.

Moore, Thomas, The Planets Within: The Astrological Psychology of Marsilio Ficino, 1982supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

when the body is at rest the soul (psychē), being set in motion and awake, administers her own household and of herself performs all the acts of the body.

Bremmer documents the archaic Greek free-soul doctrine in which the soul becomes fully active and autonomous precisely when the body sleeps.

Jan N. Bremmer, The Early Greek Concept of the Soul, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

ONE. THE SOUL 3 TWO. THE SOUL OF THE LIVING 13 The Free Soul The Ego Souls The Soul Animals Conclusion THREE. THE SOUL OF THE DEAD 70

Bremmer’s scholarly apparatus establishes the foundational distinction between free soul and ego-souls in early Greek religion, providing the historical baseline for depth psychology’s inherited vocabulary.

Jan N. Bremmer, The Early Greek Concept of the Soul, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

if you can tolerate the full weight of human possibility as the raw material for an alchemical, soulful life, then at the end of the path you may have a vision within yourself of the lapis… divinity will emanate from your very being.

Moore invokes alchemical symbolism to argue that a soulful life requires the full integration of human shadow as raw material for transformation.

Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition: A Guide, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the Soul directs its Act towards him and holds closely to him and in that love brings forth the Eros through whom it continues to look towards him.

Plotinus situates Soul as a hypostasis that generates Eros through its longing directed upward toward Divine Mind, establishing the Neoplatonic vertical cosmology of soul.

Plotinus, The Six Enneads, 270supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

soul is nowhere lacking, though a recipient of soul may be… the entry of soul into body takes place under two forms.

Plotinus describes soul’s universal diffusion and the mechanics of its embodiment, foundational to depth psychology’s Neoplatonic inheritance.

Plotinus, The Six Enneads, 270supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Renaissance Neoplatonism enabled the soul to welcome all its figures and forms, encouraging the individual to participate in the soul’s teeming nature and to express soul in an unsurpassed outburst of cultural activity.

Hillman argues that the Renaissance’s cultural explosion was grounded in the Neoplatonic rediscovery of the imaginal psyche and soul’s polytheistic richness.

Hillman, James, Re-Visioning Psychology, 1975supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

sees the kind of soul involved in success, sees also what success looks like from the point of view of the soul of the world… this thinking through becomes a way of ensouling.

Sardello presents ensouling as a mode of thinking that holds individual and world-soul perspectives simultaneously, releasing the forces of soul from unconscious constraint.

Sardello, Robert, Facing the World with Soul: The Reimagination of Modern Life, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in neither sense is it reasonable to call the soul a harmony… There just is more than one composition of bodily parts and in more than one way.

Aristotle refutes the harmony theory of soul, clearing ground for his own account of soul as the organizing form irreducible to any material composition.

Aristotle, De Anima (On the Soul), -350supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

each man has one anima figure that truly represents his soul. Even if the psyche is a plurality of complexes, each with its soul-spark, one man, one anima is the formula.

Hillman reports Jung’s principle that despite psychic plurality each man’s soul is represented by a single anima figure, noting the practical and theoretical limits this places on the concept.

Hillman, James, Anima: An Anatomy of a Personified Notion, 1985aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

there is no life without soul; either, then, the soul supplies the reasoning life— and man therefore is not an essence but simply an activity of the soul— or the soul is the man.

Plotinus poses the metaphysical question of whether man is identical with soul or merely its activity, a tension that reverberates through the entire depth-psychology treatment of soul.

Plotinus, The Six Enneads, 270aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

to be true to soul, I should keep the friendship model… You will be following the example of the great teacher of soul, Socrates, and doing something concrete to introduce soul into your life.

Moore extends soul-care into the domain of relationship, arguing that the Socratic friendship model — rather than institutional training — is the proper vehicle for soul’s cultivation.

Moore, Thomas, Care of the Soul Twenty-fifth Anniversary Edition: A Guide, 1992aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

experiences are not events that take place in a historical vacuum. We recall and interpret our experience with the help of stereotypes of the particular society in which we live.

Bremmer cautions against importing modern psychological categories into the study of ancient soul-beliefs, noting that experience itself is culturally mediated.

Jan N. Bremmer, The Early Greek Concept of the Soul, 1983aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms