Seba.Health

Concept · Seba Knowledge Graph

Pauli-Jung Correspondence

Pauli-Jung Correspondence

The sustained dialogue between Wolfgang Pauli, one of the principal architects of quantum mechanics, and C.G. Jung is the scientific scaffold beneath the unus-mundus hypothesis. The correspondence ran from the mid-1930s into the 1950s. Its central question: does the archetype operate as a formal ordering principle in both psyche and matter?

Pauli accepted the principle in outline. marie-louise-von-franz records that Pauli “examines Jung’s synchronicity principle sympathetically… He emphasized its possible significance for the concept of biological evolution. He also accepts the archetypal significance of numbers, stressing that other mathematical ‘primal intuitions,’ such as those of the continuum and of the infinity of the number series, might be archetypal” (von Franz 2014). In Lectures on Jung’s Typology von Franz quotes Pauli directly: “no new theory, or no new fruitful invention in the field of science, has ever been put forth without the working of an archetypal idea” (von Franz & Hillman 2013). Pauli’s essay on Kepler and Fludd, published alongside Jung’s Synchronicity in Naturerklärung und Psyche (1952), is the programmatic statement: Kepler’s trinitarian three-principle theory displaces Fludd’s correspondence theory precisely because it activates a different archetypal pattern.

Jung’s side of the exchange appears throughout the late work. In Man and His Symbols (1964) he records that “Pauli expected that the idea of the unconscious would spread beyond the ‘narrow frame of therapeutic use’ and would influence all natural sciences that deal with general life phenomena” — a forecast later echoed by Costa de Beauregard and the cybernetics tradition.

The unus mundus is the metaphysical wager the correspondence opens onto: that psyche and matter are complementary readings of a single, neutral-natured ground.

Relationships

Primary sources