The Divine Feminine occupies one of the most contested and generative positions within the depth-psychological tradition, functioning simultaneously as an archetypal structure, a theological corrective, and a diagnostic category for cultural pathology. Erich Neumann establishes its structural grammar in The Great Mother, articulating a vast symbolic taxonomy in which the Archetypal Feminine manifests as Great Round, Lady of Plants and Animals, and finally as Sophia — a self-revelation that is at once historical and eternal. Joseph Campbell extends this grammar across world traditions, reading Aphrodite, Kuan Yin, the Virgin Mary, and the Hindu Rajarajeshvari as regional inflections of a single transcendent-immanent presence. Harvey and Baring press further into theological recovery, arguing that the suppression of the Shekinah, the marginalization of Mary’s instinctual depths, and the patriarchal flattening of Islam’s feminine divine attributes represent a collective wound demanding repair. Marion Woodman brings the problematic into clinical immediacy: the Black Madonna erupts in contemporary dreams precisely because patriarchal consciousness has refused the dark, instinct-rooted feminine. Marie-Louise von Franz locates the same dynamic in alchemy and fairy tale, where the repressed Great Mother returns through the archetype’s ‘back door.’ Henry Corbin illuminates the Sufi strand, in which Woman becomes the supreme theophanic mirror through which man contemplates the divine image. The central tension throughout is between transcendence and immanence — whether the Feminine is projected upward into pure spirit or grounded in nature, body, and the unconscious — and the cost, psychological and civilizational, of refusing her wholeness.