Work · Seba Knowledge Graph
Collected Works Volume 3: The Psychogenesis of Mental Disease
Collected Works Volume 3: The Psychogenesis of Mental Disease
Collected Works Volume 3: The Psychogenesis of Mental Disease is a work by C. G. Jung (1907).
Core claims
- Volume 3 is not a clinical handbook but a fifty-year philosophical argument — from 1907 to 1958 — that psychosis possesses intelligible meaning, and that psychiatry’s refusal to read that meaning constitutes its deepest failure, not its scientific rigor.
- Jung’s 1907 monograph on dementia praecox functions as the hidden origin point of the entire Collected Works: the discovery that schizophrenic neologisms and delusions are structured by feeling-toned complexes is the empirical foundation on which archetypes, the collective unconscious, and individuation are later built.
- The volume’s arc reveals that Jung never resolved the psychogenesis question but instead transformed it: what begins as a debate about whether schizophrenia has psychological or organic causes becomes, by 1958, an insistence that the question itself is wrongly framed — that psyche and soma are aspects of one reality, and that the materialist prejudice against psychic causation is itself a symptom.
Related questions
- How does Jung’s argument in Volume 3 that psychotic content reveals “a crude and unmitigated system of opposites” compare to the structured integration of opposites described in Mysterium Coniunctionis (CW 14), and what does this tell us about the relationship between psychosis and the alchemical opus?
- Jung claims in “Schizophrenia” (1958) that the psyche is more primary than the atom. How does this ontological position relate to Wolfgang Pauli’s collaboration with Jung on synchronicity in CW 8, and does it resolve or deepen the mind-body problem that Stanislav Grof later confronts in his work on non-ordinary states?
- Edward Edinger’s concept of the ego-Self axis presupposes that archetypal encounter can be either integrative or annihilating depending on ego strength. How does Jung’s clinical distinction in Volume 3 between the psychotic’s passive witnessing and the individuant’s dialogical engagement serve as the unacknowledged foundation for Edinger’s entire diagnostic framework?
See also
- Library page:
/library/the-psyche/jung-collected-works-3-psychogenesis/
This is a Tier 1 stub node, generated from the library catalog. It provides the work’s place in the graph and basic typed edges. A Tier 3 deep recon can enrich it with passage-level concept development, figure engagements, and inter-work edges.
Seba.Health